2014 Camaro Z/28: The Bad is Back

Photo credit: Autoblog.com

Like many of my fellow enthusiasts, my automotive preferences lie with low-weight, high-power performance cars. This sector is primarily filled with stripped-out Porsches, Ferraris, BMWs and Audis, which are more often-than-not unobtainable to the common working man. This disturbing trend of “less weight means more money” was not always the case, though. In the late 1960’s, America found itself embroiled within an internal motorsport battle-royale. The SCCA (Sports Car Club of America) developed a racing series called the “Trans-Am Series” that featured production-based race cars, which participated in either the Under 2.0 Liter or the Over 2.0 Liter class. European manufacturers, such as Alfa Romeo and Porsche, competed alongside the best America had to offer, with race-offerings from nearly every corporate division.

Grid from the Golden Era of Trans-Am racing

Ford developed the Mustang Boss 302, while sister company Mercury offered the Cougar XR7. Chevrolet masterminded the almighty Z/28, and the S-Code designation for the Plymouth Barracuda was made specifically for the Trans-Am series. These cars were piloted by some of the biggest racing names ever to grace the tarmac, drivers such as Parnelli Jones, Dan Gurney, and Swede Savage. However, my absolute favorite of the legendary Trans-Am drivers has to be Mark Donohue and his Penske/Sunoco Camaro Z/28.  

No other classic racecar has left quite the same impression on me than the royal-blue-on-yellow Sunoco Camaro. With Donohue at the helm, the Sunoco Camaro snagged the first place in the ’68 and ’69 Trans-Am series, thus cementing the Z/28 into racing history. The Trans-Am battle was not just relegated to the track, however. Trans-Am fever spilled over onto the streets of America as homologation specials roared from stoplight to stoplight. While the Boss Mustang badge was discontinued in the mid ‘70s, the Z/28 proved to have staying power. The Z/28 badge was carried on from ’68 through ’74, reintroduced in ’77, and continued all the way up until the final Camaro year in 2002. With the demise of the Camaro, it meant the demise of the Z/28, and the end to a road-racing legacy. Sure, some of the Z/28 models in the ‘70s and ‘80s were less-than-inspiring, but the badge was always so damn mean. The death of both the Camaro and the Z/28 legacy was a huge blow for the masses of Camaro fans worldwide.

However, I’m happy to report the Z/28 has returned to the world of the living. The badge is back. The ‘mean’ is back.

The bad is back.

Photo credit: Autoblog.com 

At the 2013 NYC Auto show, Chevrolet revealed one of the most hardcore vehicles it has ever produced. The 2014 Camaro Z/28 sports a 300 lb. weight reduction, thanks in part to thinner glass, a diet-heavy alacantara-swathed interior, and new lightweight wheels. Cog-swappers, rejoice; The Z/28 is a manual-only muscle car. The Camaro receives a heavily reworked chassis, carbon-ceramic brakes, and a sexy front-splitter/undertray system. Lets go back to the previous statement; Carbon-ceramic brakes….on a Camaro! What a world we live in…..

It also is fitted with a new engine, and oh my goodness, what an engine it is.

I have not been looking forward to the eventual and inevitable death of the C6 Z06 Corvette. The discontinuation of the Z06 would mean the discontinuation of the LS7, which in my eyes, is one of the greatest American V8s produced in the last decade. GM must have noticed my tearful depression, and amazingly, the 7.0L smallblock has been given a lifeline with the Z/28. Oh yes, America has a 427 Camaro once again. Do I smell a factory Yenko package on the horizon? I sure hope so. And for those not convinced, here is what you have to look forward to:

Lets recap. A lightened, manual-only 500 HP 427 Camaro with active-aero, Recaro seats, and carbon-ceramic brakes. Oh my. If that does not get your heart racing, please visit your doctor, because that’s the greatest list of options ever to grace an American muscle car, ever. If its not already apparent, I’m just a bit excited.

 These statistics are all well and good, but how does the Z/28 stack up to against its competition?

Well, the inadequate resurrection of the Camaro ZL1 nameplate has the Shelby GT500 covered, and the parts-bin special 1LE Camaro faces the Mustang GT Track Pack. The obvious choice would be to compare the Z/28 to the new Boss 302, but Ford dashed the hopes of fans everywhere with the news of no Boss for the 2014 model year. That being said, lets do a little math and logic to see if the Z/28 can come out on top.

In a comparison between the 2012 Camaro ZL1 and the quite ridiculous 2013 Shelby GT500, the GT500 is bested around a track setting by roughly one half-second. Then, according to Chevrolet themselves, the ZL1 is whipped by the Z/28 on an unnamed track by over a mind-boggling three seconds per-lap. Enter Boss, stage left; the ZL1 trounces a Boss 302 Laguna Seca by about two seconds in this professional MotorTrend comparison. Don’t even bother with the Dodge Challenger SRT8 392, as I highly doubt the too-heavy cruiser could even best a Mustang GT around a track. Also withheld are the Cadillac CTS-V and Corvette due to a higher price point and the fact that the Corvette is not a muscle car.  So, without any real world tests, drag strip rumbles, or diagnostics, we can unofficially say that the Z/28 is the fastest muscle car around a track setting. You can keep your 660 HP quarter-mile missiles, Shelby. I want this Camaro GT3 RS.

Photo credit: Autoblog.com

The return of the Z/28, Boss, Stingray, and ZL1 within a two year span indicates much for the future of American muscle. Maybe we will see a return of the Chevelle, 442, CobraJet, and Mach 1. Maybe a Boss 429?

How about we bring back Pontiac, first. 

2014 C7 Corvette: Evolutionary, not revolutionary

Photo credit: Autoblog.com

Let me begin this post by making my opinion on the C7 readily apparent, so that there is no chance for confusion.
 I think the C7 Corvette is a thing of beauty. Even as a hardcore Porschephile, I wouldn’t think twice about plunking down my hard-earned hypothetical money for a bright red C7 in lieu of a 991 Carrera. Simply put, the C7’s performance-per-dollar ratio eclipses absolutely every contender on the market, even without any official pricing information. GM has out done itself; rising from the ashes, it produced a through-and-through performance world-beater.

 There is one thing that seriously bothers me about the C7, however. The fanfare that accompanies the unveiling of perennial icons in the automotive industry, like a new 911, Mustang, or SL Class, is always laden with automotive superlatives and hype that finds the general fan base screaming praises and irrelevant buzzwords at whoever is around to listen. The release of the C7 was no different.

The C7 buzzword du jour is ‘revolutionary’. To truly speak of a car as ‘revolutionary’, it must be a jarring departure from the established norm. The C7, at face value, is not revolutionary. I am being slightly unfair at this point, as much of the technology is indeed groundbreaking, if only at the Corvette’s price point. Perhaps a closer look into the history of the Corvette will provide better examples.

The primary point of praise (or lack thereof) is the C7’s aesthetic design. It incorporates functional ducts, aero effects, and a heavily revised rear-end, all while retaining the classic Corvette silhouette.

This is where the issue resides.

The last “revolutionary” Corvette, in terms of design, was the C4. Take a look at the Corvette generations. The eternal Corvette shape was “found” in the C4 (hint: the gold one). The C2 was a massive departure from the C1, and the C3 slimmed the design down, appearing sleek and svelte in its profile. The C4 eliminated the curves, and added a pinch of ‘80s boxy-ness that has become a mainstay of Corvette design up to the current C7. The C4 is undeniably the genesis of the modern Corvette, the influence of the design riding through the decades, all the way up into the 2014. The C7 is not a revolution, but an evolution. Is this a bad thing? Absolutely not. In fact, this is the trademark of heritage. Is there another car, besides the Corvette, that is successful in design, racing, sales, and pedigree, that has stood the test of time despite having the same basic layout and visual profile? I can think of one. 

 Has the Porsche 911 suffered for its stubborn design? No. The timeless design became the defining feature of the 911, allowing Porsche to cement itself onto the automotive landscape. With this in mind, what is the issue with approaching the Corvette with the same outlook?

From a technological standpoint, the formula of progression has not changed much at all. Each new Corvette model is heralded for its bargain performance, a true supercar killer. The C7 is not exempt from this, many people calling it the performance bargain of the decade. I am inclined to agree, but the C6 and its variants were labeled as such in their time as well. I cannot remember any other supercar, post-2000, that caused as much of an uproar than the C6 ZR1. Backed into a corner in 2009, GM flexed their muscles and created a sports car that is nothing short of a masterpiece. A world beater, indeed.

So what makes this new Corvette ‘revolutionary’?

Nothing. It brings nothing new that Ferrari and Porsche hasn’t already achieved (Think 7-speed manual transmission) to the game. Sure, if you squint real hard, you can say the C7 is “revolutionary” within the constraints of the Corvette universe. The interior is one hell of a leap forward from previous iterations, and the all-new LT1 engine is (evidently) superior to the LS series of V8s that it replaces. Power is up by about 20 horsepower, and the 0-60 time drops by about .2 seconds. Impressive? Nothing I would call world changing. Sure, a car is more than a list of stats, but if you listen to the journalists who covered the reveal, one would think it’s the only thing that matters.

I look to sports car evolution with an eye to tradition and a certain respect for the past. The C7 is already one of the all time great sports cars, but its fans have been too quick to run from its heritage, eschewing past ancestry for the “All new, better, different” Corvette.

That makes me a bit sad.